
In a country grappling with overpopulation, environmental degradation and unemployment, a groundbreaking solution has emerged from Madhya Pradesh, have four children and get rewarded with ₹1 lakh. Yes, you read that correctly. While the world frets over climate change, resource scarcity and burgeoning populations, Pandit Vishnu Rajoria, chairman of the government-run Parshuram Kalyan Board, has proposed this visionary idea to secure the future of the Brahmin community. Forget population control; why not incentivize multiplication instead?
*The ₹1 Lakh Incentive*
Let’s crunch some numbers. ₹1 lakh for four children translates to ₹25,000 per child. In an era of skyrocketing costs for education, healthcare and childcare, this generous sum is surely enough to cover all expenses, right?
Considering current inflation rates, even a newborn’s vaccination schedule might cost half of this amount.
Perhaps families might consider having a fifth or sixth child for extra blessings. Maybe Rajoria’s board will even roll out bulk discounts in the future, rewarding families for hitting milestones like “10 children for ₹5 lakh” or “20 children for a lifetime supply of ration.”
It’s worth wondering if this incentive accounts for hidden costs like emotional labor, time investment or the increasingly common “parental burnout.” After all, raising children isn’t just a numbers game—unless, of course, the goal is population supremacy.
*Revolutionizing Population Control*
India’s population, already at a staggering 1.43 billion, hardly seems in need of expansion. But according to Rajoria, the issue isn’t overpopulation; it’s underrepresentation of the Brahmin community. His concern about the dominance of “vidharmi” (heretics) highlights the demographic chessboard he’s attempting to manipulate.
This isn’t just family planning—it’s strategic reproduction. Imagine if every community adopted this approach. The nation could turn into a breeding ground for competing demographics. The Olympics of reproduction would see medals awarded for “Highest Birth Rate of the Year” or “Most Fertile District.”
Meanwhile, policymakers in other countries might marvel at how India tackles overpopulation—not with control but with encouragement. Rajoria’s approach could even inspire international campaigns like “Have a Family of 15: Save the Nation.”
*A Question of Priorities*
The proposal prioritizes quantity over quality. Instead of focusing on improving opportunities for existing children, the emphasis is on increasing headcount. Why bother creating sustainable livelihoods, improving public health, or reforming education systems when you can simply produce more people to address demographic concerns?
Interestingly, Rajoria acknowledged the financial burden of raising children but dismissed it with the ease of someone who’s likely never had to budget for rising school fees or healthcare bills. One wonders if the ₹1 lakh incentive accounts for the long-term costs of parenting—or if it assumes that families will find a way to manage on sheer willpower.
*The Politics of Reproduction*
Unsurprisingly, the proposal has sparked political debate. Senior BJP leader Dr. Hitesh Bajpai defended Rajoria, claiming this scheme addresses declining Hindu fertility rates. Meanwhile, Congress leader Mukesh Nayak criticized the idea, highlighting how it exacerbates existing issues like resource scarcity, unemployment and environmental degradation.
But why let logic or science interfere with cultural preservation? Rajoria’s approach suggests that demographic superiority is a higher priority than sustainable development. As for environmental concerns, families can simply designate one of their four children to study climate science. Surely, they’ll come up with a solution to reverse climate change caused by unchecked population growth.
This proposal isn’t unique in its short-sightedness. Many populist policies worldwide prioritize immediate cultural gains over long-term consequences. However, rarely do such schemes openly disregard basic arithmetic about resources, infrastructure and the planet’s carrying capacity.
*A Glimpse Into the Future*
Let’s fast-forward a couple of decades. Thanks to Rajoria’s initiative, the Brahmin community is thriving, bursting at the seams with engineers, doctors, and lawyers (assuming they can all find jobs in an overcrowded market). Meanwhile, the country faces severe shortages of water, food and clean air.
By then, policymakers might introduce follow-up schemes to address the crisis caused by this unchecked growth. Imagine initiatives like:
“Have 10 Children and Get Free Oxygen Cylinders”
“Produce 15 Kids and Win Priority Access to Clean Water”
Such measures would undoubtedly encourage innovative solutions to India’s self-inflicted problems. After all, necessity is the mother of invention—or, in this case, overpopulation is the mother of crisis management.
*Historical Context and Ethical Concerns*
It’s worth noting that India has a complex history of family planning. The Emergency-era forced sterilizations under Indira Gandhi were a dark chapter, emphasizing how sensitive the issue of population control is in the country. Rajoria’s proposal, while not coercive, brings its own set of ethical dilemmas.
Should reproductive policies be dictated by caste, religion, or political motives?
And who gets to decide how many children a family should have? While sustainable living and personal choice are favored by many, this initiative takes a decidedly top-down approach, where reproduction is no longer a private decision but a communal responsibility.
*Global Implications*
On the global stage, such schemes could position India as a case study in misguided policymaking. At a time when the world is focusing on sustainable growth, India’s experiment with incentivized reproduction might be viewed as a cautionary tale.
Other nations struggling with population decline might take note—but hopefully not emulate. Instead, they might focus on policies that balance population needs with environmental sustainability and human well-being.
Pandit Vishnu Rajoria’s scheme may seem outlandish to some, but it is undeniably bold. By rewarding families for having four children, he’s not just addressing population concerns—he’s creating a roadmap for demographic dominance.
Of course, whether this roadmap leads to prosperity or chaos is anyone’s guess. But one thing is certain: with policies like these, India’s future will never be boring.