Dr. Fiaz Maqbool Fazili
There was a time when elders taught us simple principles that required neither academic qualifications nor social media validation. Among the most enduring lessons was: speak the truth, stand with the truth, and do not remain silent in the face of wrongdoing. These values were instilled not merely as moral ideals but as obligations of conscience and faith.
As children, we were taught that honesty was a virtue, justice was a duty, and concern for the welfare of others was a mark of good character. We were encouraged to speak up when we witnessed wrongdoing, assist those in need, and contribute positively to society. These teachings formed the foundation of our moral compass.
Yet, as many of us grow older, we discover a troubling reality. The world often celebrates convenience more than truth, popularity more than principle, and silence more than constructive criticism. Those who speak honestly about societal shortcomings frequently encounter resistance, ridicule, and even hostility. Appreciation is rare; criticism is abundant.
This raises an important question: How does one remain resilient while standing for truth in an increasingly intolerant environment?
The Burden of Speaking Out:
Throughout my professional and social life, I have consciously tried to remain apolitical. My concerns have largely revolved around issues that affect ordinary people regardless of ideology, religion, social status, or political affiliation.
These include growing societal insensitivity towards crime, reckless traffic behaviour that claims innocent lives, extravagant spending on weddings amidst widespread economic hardship, poor waste management practices, environmental degradation, preventable illnesses, preventive oncology, patient safety, healthcare quality, and ethical conduct in public life.
These are not controversial subjects. At least, they should not be., nor personal attacks.
Yet, every time one raises such concerns, reactions often reveal an uncomfortable truth about society. Many people prefer criticism of others but become defensive when collective responsibility is discussed. They readily acknowledge problems but resist introspection. They support reform in principle but oppose it when it requires changing personal habits.
One would imagine that advocating cleaner streets, safer roads, responsible healthcare, environmental protection, or ethical conduct would unite people. Unfortunately, reality is often different.
Instead of encouraging dialogue, some choose to question motives. Instead of debating ideas, they target individuals. Instead of discussing substance, they focus on personalities.
In such circumstances, standing for truth becomes emotionally exhausting.
Why Truth Faces Resistance
Truth has never been universally welcomed.History repeatedly demonstrates that societies often resist messages that challenge established behaviours. Whether the issue concerns public health, social reform, corruption, environmental protection, or ethical accountability, resistance frequently arises because truth demands change.
Change is uncomfortable.;
It requires individuals and institutions to acknowledge shortcomings. It forces communities to confront practices that have become normalized. It compels us to examine our own roles in perpetuating problems.
Consequently, the messenger often becomes more controversial than the message itself.
The challenge is not unique to our times. Prophets, reformers, scholars, physicians, educators, and social activists throughout history encountered opposition when advocating beneficial change.
The Qur’an repeatedly reminds believers that truth and patience are inseparable companions. Those who strive to promote good and discourage harmful practices should expect obstacles rather than assume universal acceptance.
The Social Media Amplifier:
Modern technology has added a new dimension to this challenge.
Social media provides unprecedented opportunities to share ideas, educate communities, and raise awareness. At the same time, it has become a platform where outrage often travels faster than reason.
A thoughtful article may receive modest attention, while a sensational accusation can spread within hours.
Constructive criticism is frequently misunderstood as negativity. Nuanced discussions are reduced to slogans. Context disappears. Intentions are assumed. Judgments are delivered instantly.The result is a culture where people increasingly hesitate to speak honestly for fear of backlash.
This silence carries a heavy price.
When responsible voices withdraw, irresponsible voices dominate. When experts remain silent, misinformation flourishes. When citizens stop caring, societal problems deepen.Therefore, retreating from public engagement cannot be the answer.
Resilience: The Forgotten Virtue:
The ability to withstand criticism without abandoning principle is called resilience.
Resilience does not mean stubbornness. It does not imply refusing to listen to others. Rather, it reflects the capacity to continue pursuing what is right despite misunderstanding, opposition, or disappointment.
A resilient person understands several important realities.
First, not everyone will agree with them.
Second, good intentions do not guarantee favourable reactions.
Third, criticism is often inevitable when discussing difficult issues.
Fourth, meaningful change usually occurs gradually rather than immediately.
Most importantly, resilience enables individuals to separate their mission from public approval.
If one’s commitment to truth depends entirely on applause, that commitment will eventually collapse. Public opinion is unpredictable. Today’s appreciation may become tomorrow’s criticism.
Values rooted in conviction are more durable than those dependent upon popularity.
The Faith Perspective:
For believers, resilience draws strength from faith.Islam encourages believers to promote what is good and discourage what is harmful, while simultaneously emphasizing wisdom, patience, compassion, and humility.
The objective is not self-righteousness. It is service.
One must constantly examine one’s intentions.
The Author is a columnist who writes on civilized society, ethical values, healthcare, and social reforms, and regularly raises awareness on issues concerning moral responsibility, civic consciousness, and community welfare.
