JUNAID AHMAD RATHER
Abstract
In the technologically rich environment of film schools, one foundational element is repeatedly sought after and often missing: the actor. Despite the availability of high- end cameras, editing tools, lighting setups, and set design, student filmmakers frequently find themselves in desperate search of trained performers to bring their stories to life. This paper explores this paradox, emphasizing the indispensable role of actors as live, thinking, feeling bodies essential collaborators in cinematic storytelling. Drawing from observational experiences, performance theory, and arts pedagogy, the paper investigates how this “search for the actor” reveals deeper gaps in film education, where technology is prioritized over performance. It also argues for the integration of performing arts within film curricula, urging institutions to acknowledge actors not merely as supporting tools, but as co-creators of cinematic language.
Introduction
In the creative laboratories of film schools, where young directors are trained in the mechanics of visual storytelling, a curious contradiction emerges. The studios are filled with cameras, lights, editing suites, and all the paraphernalia of production. And yet, one thing is constantly being sought actors. These aspiring directors, with their scripts in hand, often wander through theatre departments, student groups, or social media, hoping to find performers to complete their vision.
This observation is not just anecdotal—it points to a deeper truth about the nature of cinema. The actor is not an accessory to the filmmaking process but a vital presence, a living embodiment of story, emotion, and conflict. Without the actor, the camera has no subject, the dialogue has no voice, and the mise-en-scene remains static. The performer transforms text into energy, presence, and narrative.
This paper begins with the simple but profound act of searching for actors and expands it into a discussion about the role of performance in film education. Why are actors not structurally embedded in film school curricula? Why is the performing body treated as an afterthought, rather than the starting point? These questions frame the discussion and lead us into a re-examination of how we train filmmakers and performers alike.
The Live Body: A Cinematic Necessity
Cinema, while a recorded medium, fundamentally depends on a concept central to live performance presence. The camera records, but what it captures is the living energy of a performer who exists fully in the moment. Richard Schechner’s theory of performance highlights the idea of “restored behavior” the actor performing life. In film, this life is preserved through technology, but it originates in the body of the actor.
Unlike props or settings, actors cannot be manufactured. They must be trained, sensitized, and nurtured. They bring nuance, unpredictability, and spontaneity— qualities that machines cannot replicate. Even in genres dominated by special effects or digital manipulation, the actor remains the emotional anchor. Consider how a single glance, breath, or hesitation by an actor can shift the mood of a scene.
This centrality of the actor is often underappreciated in educational institutions where emphasis is placed on the mechanical, visual, and post-production aspects of cinema. The live body becomes an afterthought, sourced externally, often at the last moment. This paper contends that such an approach devalues the essential role that performance plays in the filmmaking process.
Performing Arts as the Soul of Film
Theatre and film have always shared a symbiotic relationship. Many of the world’s greatest film actors from Naseeruddin Shah to Meryl Streep emerged from rigorous training in theatre. Stage performance instills in actors a deep understanding of voice, gesture, space, and presence skills that translate powerfully to the screen.
Performing arts offer more than just technique; they cultivate imagination, empathy, and discipline. These qualities allow actors to build characters from within, making them believable and memorable. For student directors, working with performers who have theatrical grounding often leads to richer storytelling and stronger screen presence.
Moreover, traditional forms such as Indian Nautanki, Kashmiri Bhand Pather, or any other Art form bring them embodied cultural memory, rhythm, and improvisation. When these actors step into film projects, they carry with them a legacy of live performance that enriches cinematic storytelling.
Gaps in Curriculum: The Marginalization of the Performer Despite the clear importance of actors, most film schools do not offer robust programs in acting. Instead, actors are often recruited from outside, with little time for rehearsal, script analysis, or character work. The collaborative relationship between actor and director, so vital to filmmaking, is left to chance.
This separation is not just logistical it reflects an epistemological divide in how performance is valued. While camera movements are diagrammed and lighting is scientifically planned, the actor’s process is treated as mysterious or secondary. As a result, many young directors graduate without ever learning how to effectively work with actors.
This lack of integration perpetuates a cycle where performance is undervalued in cinematic training. Students learn to manipulate image and sound, but not to collaborate with the human element at the center of the screen.
Reimagining Pedagogy: Towards a Collaborative Model
To address this, film schools must reimagine their pedagogical structures. Actor training should be offered within film programs, and film students should be exposed to the vocabulary and practices of performance. Shared classes, rehearsal spaces, and collaborative labs can bridge the gap.
Schools like National Film and Television School (UK) already offer integrated programs where actors and directors train together. In India, institutions such as SRFTI, FTII, NSD etc. could evolve toward more structured collaboration, drawing from each other’s strengths.
Workshops on movement, voice, improvisation, and scene work can benefit both actors and directors. These shared experiences not only enhance artistic output but also prepare students for real-world collaboration where empathy and communication are essential.
Conclusion: Re-centering the Performer
This paper began with the simple yet revealing act of searching for actors a task that every film student knows well. But within that act lies a deep and often unspoken truth: the actor is not merely a component of cinema, but its living core. Cameras and lights can record and illuminate, but only the performer can embody meaning.
As we move forward into an increasingly digital and visual world, the presence of the live performer becomes even more vital. Their craft, rooted in centuries of performance tradition, continues to breathe life into the mechanical eye of the camera.
The time has come for film education to acknowledge this. By re-centering the actor and integrating performing arts into cinematic training, we not only strengthen our films we humanize them. And in doing so, we remind ourselves that all great storytelling begins with a body, a breath, and a performance.
The Writer is Alumnus of the National School of Drama New-Delhi,Specialized in Acting.He is Currently serving as an Assistant Professor of Acting at Parul institute of Performing Arts(Parul University) .He can be reached at junaidrather19@gmail.com, junaid.rather38766@paruluniversity.ac.in instagram@Junaid_nsd
Facebook@Junaid Rather
